According to new Global Trends research by Cullen International, approaches to social media regulation vary considerably around the world.
Growing use of social media, further accelerated in many countries by social distancing policies related with the COVID-19 pandemic, led several governments to revise some of the safeguards protecting online platforms from liability and responsibility for content shared by their end -users.
Among the countries analysed in this benchmark, over the past year, China, the EU, India, Japan, and the US revised (or proposed to revise) in some respects their respective safe harbour rules.
This 50+ page Global Trends benchmark covers different aspects of social media regulation:
- Licensing requirements, ownership restrictions, supervisory authorities, and taxation.
- Safe harbour: scope and main conditions for it to apply.
- Tackling harmful or illegal content on social media platforms.
The research covers: Australia, Brazil, China, the EU, France, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, and the US.
For more information and to access our report on social media regulation trends around the globe, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our Global Trends service.
more news
15 January 25
Phasing out public payphones: regulatory conditions in the Americas
A new benchmark of Cullen International shows which countries of the Americas imposed an obligation to offer public payphones on telecoms operators and whether their removal is subject to any conditions imposed by regulation.
09 January 25
Postal regulators divided on whether and how to add new environmental powers
Our analysis of a draft report published on 11 December 2024 by the European Regulators Group for Postal Services (ERGP) entitled: Exploring the possibilities to support environmental sustainability within the postal regulatory framework.
07 January 25
Global Trends in social media regulation
Our latest Global Trends benchmark analyses different aspects of social media regulation across 13 jurisdictions around the world.