Cullen International has just published a new benchmark showing in thirteen selected countries if there are specific procedures (beyond court decisions) on dynamic blocking injunctions and the type(s) of authority involved in the process.
Dynamic blocking injunctions are used to put an end to repeated online piracy infringements (that often occur immediately after issuing an injunction), and therefore enhance the effectiveness of the measures to fight online piracy. They allow new internet locations to be covered without the need for a new procedure to obtain another injunction.
The benchmark shows that in nine out of the thirteen countries surveyed, dynamic injunctions are used to fight online piracy. Belgium, France, Italy and Spain have special procedures in place where administrative authorities (and sometimes independent regulatory authorities) are involved.
According to a report of the EU Intellectual Property Office, piracy (for films and television content) is on the rise again since the end of 2020, after having slightly fallen during the COVID-19 pandemic.

For more information and access to the benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our European Media service.
more news
26 March 26
What are New Competition Tools and who wields them?
Our new benchmark surveys which European countries have introduced so-called new competition tools (NCTs), also known as market investigation powers. NCTs enable competition authorities to intervene in markets without establishing an infringement of antitrust rules.
25 March 26
Measures to improve cost transparency for telecoms consumers in Europe
Cullen International’s latest benchmark shows measures in place in 13 European countries to ensure that end users are aware of their consumption behaviour and protected against bill shock.
24 March 26
Middle East tightens oversight of IoT connectivity as roaming and licensing frameworks evolve
Cullen International’s latest analysis shows that, while some MENA countries allow IoT connectivity through cross-border roaming arrangements, others increasingly rely on telecommunications licensing frameworks and identity verification requirements to regulate connected devices.