When facing any kind of issue regarding for example quality of service, access or billing, consumers should first address a complaint to their service providers, before referring to the national regulator, mediator, or any other competent authority.
Cullen International’s research shows that in six of the 15 European countries studied, there are no rules setting a maximum timeframe for providers to respond to a complaint.
In some cases, however, operators set such maximum timeframes in practice even in the absence of mandatory deadlines. These timeframes can be part of an industry agreement, like in Belgium, or included in the operators' general terms and conditions, like in France.
When maximum timeframes are set by law or regulation, they vary from two days (in Ireland for example) up to 45 days in Italy (where providers can set shorter deadlines themselves).
For more information and access to the benchmark, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our European Consumer Protection (in Telecoms) service.
more news
24 January 25
EU Timeline: regulatory milestones for the first half of 2025
This edition of Cullen International’s EU Timeline highlights key policy and regulatory developments foreseen at EU level until mid-2025.
20 January 25
Full-fibre networks in the Americas: overview of government policies and incentives for their deployment
Our new benchmark addresses government policies to promote the deployment of full-fibre broadband networks ((Fibre-to-the-Premise (FTTP) or Fibre-to-the-Home (FTTH)) in 11 countries of the Americas.
15 January 25
Phasing out public payphones: regulatory conditions in the Americas
A new benchmark of Cullen International shows which countries of the Americas imposed an obligation to offer public payphones on telecoms operators and whether their removal is subject to any conditions imposed by regulation.