Several authorities at national and EU levels will be responsible for the governance and enforcement of the new EU AI rulebook.
It is for EU member states to designate the national authorities that will be in charge of enforcing the rules on high-risk AI (HRAI) systems. EU countries can rely on existing authorities or create new ones.
However, national data protection authorities must have powers vis-à-vis certain HRAI systems (e.g. in the area of law enforcement, migration and biometrics).
The European Commission will have broad investigatory and enforcement powers over general-purpose AI (GPAI) models by supervising their use through a newly established AI Office.
A new European AI Board will guide the consistent application of the AI Act across the EU, while an advisory forum and a scientific panel will assist in the implementation of the new rules.
Cullen International is publishing a series of reports analysing different aspects of the new AI rulebook. Part 3 of the report series places an emphasis on all the involved national and European bodies in charge of enforcing the new rules.
See also:
Part 1: Scope
Part 2: Obligations
Part 4: Interplay with other EU acts
For more information and to access our AI Act report series, please click on “Access the full content” - or on “Request Access”, in case you are not subscribed to our European Digital Economy service.
more news
15 January 25
Phasing out public payphones: regulatory conditions in the Americas
A new benchmark of Cullen International shows which countries of the Americas imposed an obligation to offer public payphones on telecoms operators and whether their removal is subject to any conditions imposed by regulation.
09 January 25
Postal regulators divided on whether and how to add new environmental powers
Our analysis of a draft report published on 11 December 2024 by the European Regulators Group for Postal Services (ERGP) entitled: Exploring the possibilities to support environmental sustainability within the postal regulatory framework.
07 January 25
Global Trends in social media regulation
Our latest Global Trends benchmark analyses different aspects of social media regulation across 13 jurisdictions around the world.